A peer-reviewed, open-access academic journal dedicated to the advancement of sports sciences for individuals with diverse abilities

The Durability of the Effects of Analogy-Based Training on Learning Sports Skills in Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder Under Conditions of Fatigue and Stress

Authors

1 Department of Motor Learning, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University

2 Department of Physical Education, Faculty of Physical Education, Imam Hossein University

3 Department of Motor Learning and Control, Sport Sciences Research Institute

4 Department of Motor behavior and sport sychology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University

Abstract
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) face mobility challenges compared to their typically-developing peers. ASD is characterized by significant communication impairments and restricted, repetitive behaviors. Motor difficulties, including impaired balance, gait, slower movement speeds, delayed motor development, coordination issues, and exaggerated movements, are commonly associated with ASD, affecting 21% to 100% of individuals. Moreover, individuals with ASD often struggle with recognizing and assessing stressful situations, leading to heightened stress responses. They typically respond faster to fear, experience high levels of self-perceived stress, and find it difficult to cope with everyday stressors. Sensitivity to stress may be linked to dysfunction in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, resulting in increased fatigue and fatigability. Studies have shown that skills taught through explicit methods tend to be less robust in demanding situations such as fatigue, psychological stress, and multi-tasking. Consequently, less prescriptive approaches like analogy learning have been suggested. Analogies help learners grasp new concepts by relating them to familiar, similar concepts. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of analogy learning and explicit learning on javelin-throwing performance in individuals with ASD and compare the effectiveness of both methods.
Methods: This quasi-experimental study employed a pretest-posttest design with one control group. Ethical approval was obtained from the Research Ethics Committee of the relevant University and the Iran Autism Center. Written consent was provided by the participant's parents. Thirty-six individuals with ASD from the Iranian Autism Association were selected via convenience sampling. After meeting the study's inclusion criteria, participants were assigned to one of three groups: analogy learning (n=12), explicit learning (n=12), and control (n=12). The inclusion criteria included participants aged 15-30 years, a diagnosis of ASD based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition, an IQ above 50, and the ability to follow instructions. The study was conducted in an indoor gymnasium. Participants in the experimental groups attended five training sessions, each consisting of three blocks of 15 trials with 2-minute rest intervals. The control group only participated in the measurement phases. Participants in the analogy learning group watched a video of swordsmanship movements and were instructed to throw a spear. Those in the explicit learning group watched a video of javelin throwing and followed the video instructions. The control group received no instruction and threw the spear using their own methods. Throwing distance was recorded as the dependent variable, and data were analyzed using mixed analysis of variance with repeated measurements and one-way ANOVA in SPSS, with a significance level of 0.05.
Results: One-way ANOVA results showed that both the main effect of time and the interaction of time and group were significant. A significant improvement in performance was observed in the experimental groups, indicating that analogy learning is a feasible method for individuals with ASD to acquire new motor skills. The analogy learning group outperformed the explicit learning group.
Conclusion: Analogy learning proved more effective in motor learning for children with ASD compared to explicit learning. This finding holds significant implications for teachers and coaches working with individuals with ASD, especially given the participants' tendency toward visual learning. It suggests the value of using videos and applications that incorporate analogy instruction to help individuals with ASD acquire new motor skills. Further research is needed to explore different types of video modeling and the long-term effects of analogy learning.
 

Keywords


1. Baio J. Prevalence of Autism Spectrum Disorders: Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, 14 Sites, United States, 2008. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly. Centers Dis. 2012;
2. Lotter V. Epidemiology of autistic conditions in young children - 1. Prevalence. Soc Psychiatry. 1966;
3. Bishop SL, Farmer C, Bal V, Robinson EB, Willsey AJ, Werling DM, et al. Identification of developmental and behavioral markers associated with genetic abnormalities in autism spectrum disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2017;
4. Seretopoulos K, Lamnisos D, Giannakou K. The epidemiology of autism spectrum disorder. Vol. 37, Archives of Hellenic Medicine. 2020.
5. Tidmarsh L, Volkmar FR. Diagnosis and Epidemiology of Autism Spectrum Disorders. Vol. 48, Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. 2003.
6. Brugha TS, Spiers N, Bankart J, Cooper SA, McManus S, Scott FJ, et al. Epidemiology of autism in adults across age groups and ability levels. Br J Psychiatry. 2016;209(6).
7. Lyall K, Croen L, Daniels J, Fallin MD, Ladd-Acosta C, Lee BK, et al. The Changing Epidemiology of Autism Spectrum Disorders. Annu Rev Public Health. 2017;38.
8. Quill KA, Institute A. Instructional considerations for young children with autism: The rationale for visually cued instruction. Vol. 27, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 1997.
9. Mody M, Shui AM, Nowinski LA, Golas SB, Ferrone C, O’Rourke JA, et al. Communication Deficits and the Motor System: Exploring Patterns of Associations in Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). J Autism Dev Disord. 2017;47(1).
10. Fournier KA, Hass CJ, Naik SK, Lodha N, Cauraugh JH. Motor coordination in autism spectrum disorders: A synthesis and meta-analysis. J Autism Dev Disord. 2010;
11. Staples KL, Reid G. Fundamental movement skills and autism spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev Disord. 2010;40(2).
12. Jeste SS, Geschwind DH. Clinical trials for neurodevelopmental disorders: At a therapeutic frontier. Sci Transl Med. 2016;
13. Bo J, Lee CM, Colbert A, Shen B. Do children with autism spectrum disorders have motor learning difficulties? Vol. 23, Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders. 2016.
14. Zampella CJ, Wang LAL, Haley M, Hutchinson AG, de Marchena A. Motor Skill Differences in Autism Spectrum Disorder: a Clinically Focused Review. Vol. 23, Current Psychiatry Reports. 2021.
15. Sedehi AAB, Ghasemi A, Kashi A, Azimzadeh E. The relationship between the motor skills level and the severity of autism disorder in children with autism. Pedagog Phys Cult Sport. 2021;25(1).
16. Ohara R, Kanejima Y, Kitamura M, Izawa KP. Association between social skills and motor skills in individuals with autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review. Vol. 10, European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education. 2020.
17. MacDonald M, Lord C, Ulrich DA. Motor skills and calibrated autism severity in young children with autism spectrum disorder. Adapt Phys Act Q. 2014;31(2).
18. McCleery JP, Elliott NA, Sampanis DS, Stefanidou CA. Motor development and motor resonance difficulties in autism: relevance to early intervention for language and communication skills. Front Integr Neurosci. 2013;
19. Huseyin O. The impact of sport activities on basic motor skills of children with autism. Pedagog Psychol medical-biological Probl Phys Train Sport. 2019;23(3).
20. El Shemy SA, El-Sayed MS. The impact of auditory rhythmic cueing on gross motor skills in children with autism. J Phys Ther Sci. 2018;30(8).
21. Rafie F, Ghasemi A, Zamani Jam A, Jalali S. Effect of exercise intervention on the perceptual-motor skills in adolescents with autism. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2017;57(1–2).
22. Najafabadi MG, Sheikh M, Hemayattalab R, Memari AH, Aderyani MR, Hafizi S. The effect of SPARK on social and motor skills of children with autism. Pediatr Neonatol. 2018;59(5).
23. Lee J, Porretta DL. Enhancing the Motor Skills of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders. J Phys Educ Recreat Danc. 2013;
24. MacDonald M, Lord C, Ulrich DA. The relationship of motor skills and social communicative skills in school-aged children with autism spectrum disorder. Adapt Phys Act Q. 2013;30(3).
25. Mirzaei M, Ghadiri F, Arsham S, Rajabi H. The Effect of Seven Sessions of Training Program With Massed and Distributed Practice Frequency on the Acquisition of Cycling Skills in Autistic and Healthy Boy in Tehran City. he Sci J Rehabil Med. 2022;10(6):1228–43.
26. Masters RSW, Liao CM. Chunking as a characteristic of implicit motor learning. New approaches to Exerc Sport Psychol Theor Methods Appl. 2003;
27. Kal E, Prosée R, Winters M, Van Der Kamp J. Does implicit motor learning lead to greater automatization of motor skills compared to explicit motor learning? A systematic review. Vol. 13, PLoS ONE. 2018.
28. Masters RSW. Knowledge, knerves and know‐how: The role of explicit versus implicit knowledge in the breakdown of a complex motor skill under pressure. Br J Psychol. 1992;83(3).
29. Masters RSW, van Duijn T, Uiga L. Advances in implicit motor learning. In: Skill Acquisition in Sport: Research, Theory and Practice. 2019.
30. Liao CM, Masters RSW. Analogy learning: A means to implicit motor learning. J Sports Sci. 2001;19(5).
31. Lola AC, Tzetzis GC. The effect of explicit, implicit and analogy instruction on decision making skill for novices, under stress. Int J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2021;
32. Gentner D. Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cogn Sci. 1983;7(2).
33. Gentner D, Anggoro FK, Klibanoff RS. Structure mapping and relational language support children’s learning of relational categories. Child Dev. 2011;82(4).
34. Tse ACY, Masters RSW. Improving motor skill acquisition through analogy in children with autism spectrum disorders. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2019;41.
35. Gross C. Defective phosphoinositide metabolism in autism. Vol. 95, Journal of Neuroscience Research. 2017.
36. White SW, Oswald D, Ollendick T, Scahill L. Anxiety in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Vol. 29, Clinical Psychology Review. 2009.
37. Lee RWL, Tse ACY, Wong TWL. Application of analogy in learning badminton among older adults: Implications for rehabilitation. Motor Control. 2019;23(3).
38. Tissot C, Evans R. Visual teaching strategies for children with autism. Early Child Dev Care. 2003;173(4).
39. Joseph RM, Keehn B, Connolly C, Wolfe JM, Horowitz TS. Why is visual search superior in autism spectrum disorder? Dev Sci. 2009;12(6).
40. Liu T. Sensory Processing and Motor Skill Performance in Elementary School Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Percept Mot Skills. 2013;
41. Pashabadi A, Farsi A, Bahram A, Daneshfar A. Anxiety, Expertise and Gaze Behaviors during Penalty Kick Anticipation in Football Goalkeepers. Sport Psychol Stud [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2022 Sep 1];10(36):61–80. Available from: https://spsyj.ssrc.ac.ir/article_2015.html?lang=en
42. Maxwell JP, Masters RSW, Eves FF. The role of working memory in motor learning and performance. Conscious Cogn. 2003;12(3).
43. Tse ACY, Wong TWL, Masters RSW. Examining motor learning in older adults using analogy instruction. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2017;28.
44. Capio CM, Uiga L, Lee MH, Masters RSW. Application of analogy learning in softball batting: Comparing novice and intermediate players. Sport Exerc Perform Psychol. 2020;9(3).